ANTI -ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: JURISDICTION AND DISCRETION

Khushi Mishra & Rajeev Dadhich  , Institute of Law, Nirma University.

Introduction

The approach of the Indian courts in dealing with the anti-arbitration injunction has been disjunctive and imbalanced. On 12th Aug 2020, the Calcutta High court in Balasore Alloys Limited v. Medima LLC attempted to clarify the position of the Indian courts to grant an anti-arbitration injunction in a foreign seated arbitration. It held that the Indian courts have inherent power to grant anti-arbitration injunction, subject to a higher degree of the threshold. Anti-arbitration injunctions are often viewed as a challenge to the arbitral tribunals’ power to determine its own jurisdictions, generally regarded as the Kompetenz- kompetenz principle, which is perceived to be the pillar of the arbitration framework.

Against this backdrop, the article aims to discuss and critically analyze the stake of Indian jurisprudence in determining the jurisdiction to grant anti-arbitration injunction in a foreign seated arbitration, while extending an analysis through international jurisprudence.

Judicial pronouncements in Indian jurisdiction

The courts have often adopted an asymmetric approach while dealing with the issue of jurisdiction and enforcement of anti-arbitration injunctions. The Delhi High court in Bina Modi and Ors. v. Lalit Modi and Ors. held that civil courts do not have any jurisdiction to grant an anti-arbitration injunction in a foreign seated arbitration. Reliance was placed on the decision of a three-judge bench of Supreme Court in Kvaerner Cementation India Ltd v. Bajranglal Agarwal and Anr.(Kvaerner’) in which the Supreme Court relied on the object of the Arbitration Act and held that Civil courts do not have any jurisdiction to declare the invalidity of an arbitration agreement. Similarly, in Devi Resources Ltd. v. Ambo Exports Ltd the Calcutta High Court held that before granting an anti-arbitration injunction the court has to exercise extreme caution and circumspection and it cannot be issued against a foreign arbitral tribunal.

Contrary to this, there are numerous cases where the courts have refused to recognize such an interpretation. The Supreme Court in Modi entertainment network v. W.S.G. Cricket set out grounds for granting an anti-arbitration injunction which includes: (i) the defendant is amenable to the personal jurisdiction of the court, (ii) the end of justice would be served by granting an injunction, (iii) the principle of comity to be borne in mind, (iv) availability of multiple forums available and (v) the forum conveniens for bringing the action. Based on these grounds and factual circumstances of the case, the Supreme Court did not allow anti-arbitration injunction.  Further, in SBP & Co. v. Patel Engineering limited, the Supreme Court rejected the argument presented in Kvaerner that an arbitral tribunal solely has the competence to the complete exclusion of civil courts to determine its own jurisdiction. Therefore, in SBP & Co, Supreme Court impliedly overruled the dictum presented in Kvaerner Cementation.

Similarly, in Balasore Alloys Limited v. Medima LLC the Calcutta High Court, relying on Devi Resources Ltd. v. Ambo Exports Ltd held that Indian courts have the jurisdiction to grant anti-arbitration injunctions in foreign seated arbitrations. However, such a power should be used sparingly and with utmost caution. In Balasore Alloy Limited, the dispute arose on the jurisdictional conflict between India and International Chamber of Commerce (‘ICC’). While it was contended by Medima that the ICC would have the jurisdiction according to the clause in the 2018 Agency Agreement, Balasore contended the terms and conditions in purchase orders required the application of Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act with Kolkata as the venue. Relying on the principles laid down in Modi Entertainment network, the ad-interim order for an anti-arbitration injunction was denied by observing that Balasore did not completely discharge the duty of proving that the ICC is non-conveniens forum or that the proceedings before it vexatious or oppressive. Therefore, it was held that multiple proceeding is not an adequate ground to render an arbitration agreement invalid if it is not coupled with a plea of non-conveniens or vexatious or oppressive proceedings. In the Balasore Alloy Limited case Calcutta High Court upheld the ratio decidendi set out in SBP & Co. and delivered its judgment against the views of three judge bench of Supreme Court in Kvaerner Case.

In the backdrop of Indian jurisprudence regarding the grant of anti-arbitration injunction, it is  still unclear that the Indian Courts have jurisdiction to grant an anti-arbitration injunction. However, Balasore Alloy limited to a certain extent solved the dilemma but there is still an asymmetry in approach in regard to the grant of an anti-arbitration injunction against foreign seated arbitration.

International jurisprudence on anti-arbitration injunction

The foreign courts in common law and civil law countries have a mixed approach towards anti- arbitration injunction. In countries like Malaysia, United Kingdom and United States of America, anti- arbitration injunction is granted in rarest of the rare cases subjected to pertinent grounds discussed below. Therefore, jurisprudence of these countries becomes relevant in analysing Indian position on allowing anti-arbitration injunctions. The Malaysian High Court in Government of Malaysia v NurhimaKiramFornan& Ors, (2019) laid three grounds for granting anti-arbitration injunction. Firstly, if the parties have a non- binding arbitration agreement; Secondly, if the arbitration breaches sovereign immunity of the country and last, Malaysian court is a natural and proper forum to address the issue at hand. Sovereign immunity is regarded as customary international law and has wide range of practice on international forum. Malaysian High Court acknowledges the principle of sovereign immunity and has imbibed this principle in domestic law which is evident by various case laws.

India, in the context of investment arbitration, has yet not recognized sovereign immunity as a ground to grant anti- arbitration injunction.  This ground can act as a protection against claims brought by foreign stakeholders outside the ambit of commercial activity. Thus, sovereign immunity as a threshold will save Indian domestic entities against false claims, and will also not impact India’s pro-arbitration stance.

The United Kingdom courts in a plethora of cases have adjudicated that courts have both the power and jurisdiction to grant anti-arbitration injunction but subject to exceptional circumstances. Recently, in the case of Sana Ha ssib Sabbagh v Khoury and others (2019), the U.K. Court of Appeal addressed the issue of courts’ jurisdiction to grant anti- arbitration injunction and restrict the arbitration proceedings with an overseas seat. The court ruled out three essential grounds for granting an anti-arbitration injunction:(i) no power to grant an anti-arbitration injunction on the basis that the foreign arbitration is “vexatious and oppressive”,(ii)no injunction in cases where the arbitration agreement captures the dispute, i.e. a valid and binding agreement between the parties and,(iii)Natural forum, i.e. primary jurisdiction of the court prevails over the foreign seated court.

In the United States, Federal courts are empowered to issue an anti-arbitration injunction under the provisions of Federal Arbitration Act (FAA). In Société Géneralé de Surveillance, S.A. v. Raytheon European Management and Systems Co. (1981),theFirst Circuit Court of Appeal stated that nothing in the record affirms that the arbitration agreement between the parties is ‘null and void or inoperative or incapable of being performed’ therefore, held that courts have the authority to issue anti- arbitration injunction. In the Republic of Ecuador v. Chevron Corp. (2011),the Second Circuit Court upholding the position of Société Géneraléwent further to state that the decision with respect to the injunction was proper and based on the particular circumstances presented in the appeal. However, in Citigroup Global Markets Inc. v. VCG Special Opportunities Master Fund Ltd. (2010), the United State Court of Appeal set out four grounds to issue anti-arbitration injunction. Firstly, the case has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits, secondly, the parties will suffer irreplaceable damage if the injunction is not issued, thirdly, the threatened injury outweighs whatever damage the proposed injunction may cause to the opposing party and, last the injunction would not be adverse to the public interest. An inquiry on the standpoint of multiple jurisdictions makes it very much evident that majority of the countries reserve the jurisdictional rights to address the issue pertaining to anti-arbitration injunction but granting of the same is subjected to special circumstances which depend upon the facts of the case.

Critical Analysis

The grant of anti-arbitration injunction should be used with utmost caution and only in ‘rare circumstances’. The autonomy provided to arbitral proceedings should not deprive the applicant of the remedy to injunct the arbitration proceedings when he may have not consented to such an arbitral tribunal or where the proceedings have been rendered oppressive, vexatious, or non-conveniens. Under all these circumstances, Balasore Alloy limited to an extend shows a clear and balanced approach to the issue of granting an anti-arbitration injunction. The judgment sets out that if multiple proceedings arise out of parties’ knowledge or because of certain terms mentioned in the contract of which they were aware of, that fact alone cannot render the proceedings vexatious or oppressive especially when there is neutral foreign seated arbitration. The judgment grants jurisdiction to the Indian courts to issue an anti-arbitration injunction protecting the sovereign immunity of the state basing the issuance of such injunctions on high threshold limits.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, given the contentious existence of the anti-arbitration injunctions, it has arisen as one of the possible remedies in various jurisdictions. The Indian jurisprudence has by far reflected an unsettled position wherein high courts have dealt with the issue according to their whims and fancies. In the Balasore Alloy Limited, the Calcutta High Court attempted to settle the issue by allowing the Indian court’s jurisdiction to grant an anti-arbitration injunction on specific terms. The Indian courts must adopt certain principles to ensure a clear and balanced approach as to when honoring an arbitration agreement shall prevail over the challenge to such an agreement. Courts should follow a restrictive approach to grant anti-arbitration injunction and adopt a pro-arbitration stance which has been the motto of the government in recent times, also allowing for early disposal of disputes aiding India in making of an international arbitration hub.

1,762 Replies to “ANTI -ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: JURISDICTION AND DISCRETION”

  1. I would request the editor to make changes.
    Modi Network judgment was about ANTI SUIT INJUNCTION and not anti arbitration suit injunction. It has been wrongly interpreted and written in the article. Kindly acknowledge the same.

  2. Woah! I’m really enjoying the template/theme of this blog. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s difficult to get that “perfect balance” between user friendliness and visual appearance. I must say you’ve done a very good job with this. In addition, the blog loads extremely fast for me on Internet explorer. Outstanding Blog!

  3. Appreciating the persistence you put into your website and detailed information you provide. It’s good to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed information. Great read! I’ve saved your site and I’m including your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  4. I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your
    sites really nice, keep it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to
    come back later. All the best

  5. Nadie llevo mucho período usando Internet, quizá sea porque no sabía lo suficiente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como mi me hace sentir muy bien. Mi
    nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy un pequeño pueblo de
    %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto numerosos gustos y entretenimientos con el resto de la gente de este blog.
    Lo único que puedo decir existe en hora generosa por la pensamiento y el diseño que le habéis dado a esta página.

    Llevo mucho tiempo buscando escrutinio parecida y no he dado con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario habitual de la web.

    Muchas gracias por todo y deseo poder colaborar más adelante.

  6. Embargo llevo mucho período usando Internet, probablemente sea porque no sabía lo
    competente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como esta
    me hace sospechar muy bien. Mi nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy
    un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto numerosos gustos y aficiones con el resto de la
    gente de este blog. Lo único que puedo decir existe en hora benigna por la pensamiento y el
    diseño que le habéis dado a esta página. Llevo
    bastante tiempo buscando información parecida y no he dado
    con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario habitual de la web.

    Muchas gracias lucro todo y deseo poder colaborar en las siguientes lineas.

  7. Embargo llevo mucho período usando Internet, probablemente sea porque no sabía lo suficiente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como esta me hace notar muy bien. Mi
    nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto numerosos gustos y aficiones
    con el resto de la gente de este blog. Lo único que puedo decir es en hora generosa por la opinión y el diseño que le habéis dado a mi
    página. Llevo bastante tiempo buscando información parecida y no he dado con ella.

    A fin de que seré un usuario frecuente de la web.

    Muchas gracias por todo y espero poder colaborar más adelante.

  8. Embargo llevo mucho tiempo usando Internet, quizá sea porque
    no sabía lo competente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como esta me hace sentir muy bien. Mi nombre
    es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy un pequeño pueblo
    de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto numerosos gustos y entretenimientos con el resto de la multitud
    de este blog. Lo único que puedo decir está en hora generosa por la
    calidad y el diseño que le habéis dado a mi página.
    Llevo bastante tiempo buscando averiguamiento parecida y no
    he dado con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario frecuente de la web.

    Muchas gracias lucro todo y espero poder colaborar más adelante.

  9. Nadie llevo mucho periodo usando Internet, probablemente sea
    porque no sabía lo adecuado.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como mi me hace sentir muy bien.
    Mi nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto montones de gustos y
    entretenimientos con el resto de la multitud de este blog.
    Lo único que puedo decir está en hora benigna por la opinión y el diseño que le habéis dado
    a esta página. Llevo bastante tiempo buscando averiguamiento
    parecida y no he dado con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario usual de la web.

    Muchas gracias lucro todo y espero poder colaborar en las siguientes lineas.

  10. Embargo llevo mucho tiempo usando Internet, probablemente
    sea porque no sabía lo competente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como mi me hace sospechar muy bien. Esta nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y
    soy un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto numerosos gustos y distracciones con el
    resto de la gentío de este blog. Lo único que
    puedo decir es en hora buena por la calidad y el diseño que le habéis dado a mi página.
    Llevo altamente tiempo buscando escrutinio parecida y no he dado
    con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario usual de la web.

    Muchas gracias por todo y deseo poder colaborar en mi
    aporte.

  11. No llevo mucho periodo usando Internet, quizá sea porque no sabía lo
    adecuado.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como esta me
    hace notar muy bien. Esta nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat% Y soy
    un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto muchos gustos y distracciones con el resto de la gente de este
    blog. Lo único que puedo decir está en hora generosa por la pensamiento y el diseño que le habéis dado a esta página.
    Llevo altamente tiempo buscando información parecida y no he dado con ella.

    Así que seré un usuario usual de la web.

    Muchas gracias lucro todo y deseo poder colaborar en mi aporte.

  12. No llevo mucho período usando Internet, probablemente sea porque no sabía lo competente.

    Pero tengo que reconocer que páginas web como mi me hace notar
    muy bien. Esta nombre es %nombre_simple_masculino.dat%
    Y soy un pequeño pueblo de %provincias_espana.dat%, comparto muchos gustos y
    entretenimientos con el resto de la multitud de este blog.
    Lo único que puedo decir es en hora benigna por
    la pensamiento y el diseño que le habéis dado a esta
    página. Llevo bastante tiempo buscando escrutinio parecida y no he dado con ella.

    A fin de que seré un usuario frecuente de la web.

    Muchas gracias lucro todo y deseo poder colaborar en las siguientes
    lineas.

  13. I discovered your blog site on google and examine a couple of of your early posts. Continue to maintain up the very good operate. I just further up your RSS feed to my MSN Information Reader. In search of forward to studying more from you afterward!?

  14. me encantei com este site. Pra saber mais detalhes acesse nosso site e descubra mais. Todas as informações contidas são informações relevantes e exclusivas. Tudo que você precisa saber está ta lá.

  15. I’ve been browsing online more than 3 hours today, but I by no means found any attention-grabbing article like yours. It抯 beautiful price enough for me. Personally, if all webmasters and bloggers made excellent content material as you did, the internet shall be a lot more useful than ever before.

  16. You really make it seem so easy with your presentation but I find this matter to be actually something which I think I would never understand. It seems too complicated and very broad for me. I’m looking forward for your next post, I will try to get the hang of it!

  17. We stumbled over here different website and thought I might check things out. I like what I see so now i am following you. Look forward to exploring your web page repeatedly.

  18. I’m also writing to make you know what a excellent discovery our child encountered visiting the blog. She figured out so many things, which included what it’s like to possess an ideal coaching style to get many more without problems master a variety of hard to do issues. You truly surpassed our desires. I appreciate you for giving such effective, safe, informative not to mention easy tips on your topic to Tanya.

  19. you’re truly a good webmaster. The site loading pace is incredible. It kind of feels that you’re doing any unique trick. Moreover, The contents are masterwork. you have performed a excellent task on this matter!

  20. Wonderful goods from you, man. I have understand your stuff previous to
    and you’re just extremely excellent. I actually
    like what you have acquired here, really like what you are saying and the way in which you say it.
    You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it wise.
    I cant wait to read far more from you. This is actually a great site.

  21. Pingback: neoaroc
  22. Pingback: norwaynya
  23. Pingback: nawest
  24. Pingback: ornyadams
  25. Pingback: swireprops
  26. Pingback: cafeconclau
  27. Pingback: funphotoprops
  28. Pingback: comfortstall
  29. Pingback: yougoguy
  30. Pingback: flipncheck
  31. Pingback: accessforkids
  32. Pingback: yogafusionfit
  33. Pingback: malloferta
  34. Pingback: lacubanabus
  35. Pingback: hiabhire
  36. Pingback: varmanco
  37. Pingback: swireprops
  38. Pingback: cutmyface
  39. Pingback: gotosubic
  40. Pingback: smcoaches
  41. [url=http://viagraxcap.com/]viagra 50mg price in india online[/url] [url=http://viagramx.com/]us pharmacy viagra[/url] [url=http://cialisltab.com/]cialis australia pharmacy[/url] [url=http://viagragrp.com/]generic sildenafil 20 mg cost[/url] [url=http://sildenafildir.com/]sildenafil generic without a prescription[/url]

  42. Pingback: rawuae
  43. Pingback: setterdesign
  44. Pingback: bestallmoda
  45. What you posted was very logical. However, think about
    this, suppose you were to write a killer headline?
    I ain’t suggesting your information isn’t solid, but suppose you added
    something that makes people want more? I mean ANTI -ARBITRATION INJUNCTION: JURISDICTION
    AND DISCRETION – Commercial and Financial Law Reporter is a little vanilla.

    You ought to peek at Yahoo’s front page and watch how they create post
    titles to grab people interested. You might add a related video or a pic or two
    to grab readers interested about everything’ve written. Just my opinion, it would make your posts a little livelier. https://hydroxychloroquinee.com/

  46. Pingback: alicecassidy
  47. Pingback: bibleclues
  48. Pingback: yorkjobs
  49. Pingback: guiacinefila
  50. Pingback: mcarta
  51. Pingback: gesturetek
  52. Pingback: goisecurity
  53. Pingback: youreadopted
  54. Pingback: masessamd
  55. Pingback: renaytoronto
  56. Pingback: turfflags
  57. Do you have a spam issue on this blog; I also am a blogger, and
    I was wanting to know your situation; we have developed some nice procedures and we are looking to exchange methods with others, please shoot me an email if
    interested.

  58. Pingback: barconnyc
  59. Pingback: lernfest
  60. Pingback: analizkolik
  61. Pingback: goomass
  62. Pingback: nanopose
  63. Pingback: fletcherplant
  64. Pingback: doodadsinc
  65. Hi my loved one! I wish to say that this article is awesome,
    great written and come with almost all important infos.
    I’d like to see extra posts like this .

  66. Pingback: mainoste
  67. Pingback: etrevert
  68. Pingback: ivisitorstats
  69. Pingback: destinowines
  70. Pingback: thealcoveco
  71. Pingback: hotelelda
  72. Pingback: gelbett
  73. When someone writes an article he/she keeps the thought of a user in his/her mind that how
    a user can know it. Thus that’s why this piece of writing is
    great. Thanks!

  74. Magnificent goods from you, man. I’ve understand your
    stuff previous to and you’re just too fantastic. I really like what you have acquired here, really like what
    you’re stating and the way in which you say it. You make it entertaining and you still care for to keep it sensible.
    I can’t wait to read far more from you. This is really a great site. http://droga5.net/