Shubham Gupta, a 4th year student the Institute of Law, Nirma University.
In the recent Adjudication officer (‘AO’) order dated on 31st December2019, SEBI took a stand that it can proceed with the adjudication proceedings against a company even though the company is under liquidation. This stand is inconsistent with the approach adopted by SEBI till now and is likely to be non-est. in law.
Continue reading “SEBI swerved on non-interference in Winding Up matters”
Shubham Gupta, a 4th year law student at the Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad
Continue reading “SEBI Engulfs Non-Monetary Transactions – Extending tThe Scope of Material Financial Relationships”
In the recent informal guidance dated 6th Jan. 2020 in Gujarat State Petronet Ltd., the SEBI, in response to the interpretative letter, has clarified that even non-monetary transactions are within the scope of material financial relationships. Clause 14 of Schedule B of SEBI (PIT) (Amendment) Regulations, 2018 stipulates that all designated persons in a company are required to disclose the details of those persons with whom they share a “material financial relationship”. Bringing non-monetary transactions within the ambit of material financial relationship – may have far-reaching unintended consequences and senior executives may be stretched into the blanket of violation easily. This article seeks to analyze the informal guidance issued by SEBI, and emphasizing the needs of the industry.
Shubham Gupta, a 4th year law student at the Institute of Law, Nirma University
*Orginally published at Taxmann.com
In 2019, the Indian financial market has confronted many climacteric corporate issues like IL & FS, DHFL, Tata- Mistry, Infosys, etc. which appeal for a change in dynamics of corporate governance and compliance culture. In this regard, regulators and government bodies relentlessly fosters to adopt better compliance practices across the world. One of such advent interventions, the capital market regulator, SEBI vouched for separation of position of chairman and CEOs/ managing directors – which, in turn would cultivate a corporate democracy.Separation of position and roles of the chairman of board and CEOs/Managing directors is assumed on the basis that the management look over the affairs of the company whereas the board supervises the management, on behalf of the shareholders of the company. Essentially, this demand a non-aligned interest between the board and the management to have effective governance and management.
Continue reading “Splitting CEO’s Duality role: The landscape to independent Board Leadership ?”